Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
485 King St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64486, -79.39696
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 17 September 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 226512 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 May 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0047/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 May 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 159483 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 September 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 219779 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 226512 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 September 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0047/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 25 May 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 16 159483 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 May 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 219779 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 September 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
533 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 226512 STE 20 SA · submitted 17 September 2018 · Closed · from registration SM22313 (Westbank Projects Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22313: Rezoning and redevelopment of 489-539 King Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 226512 STE 20 SA at 533 King St W: Site Plan Control application for a mixed-use development of residental, office, and retail/restaurant uses: 34,916.0 square metres residential gross floor area; 20,111.0 square metres non-residential gross floor area. This site plan application is associated with the recently approved (LPAT Settle… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning and redevelopment of 489-539 King Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 489-539 KING ST W
- application_address
- 539 KING ST W
533 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 226512 STE 20 SA · submitted 17 September 2018 · Closed · from registration SM31406 (Allied REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31406: On-going planning application at 489-539 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 226512 STE 20 SA at 533 King St W: Site Plan Control application for a mixed-use development of residental, office, and retail/restaurant uses: 34,916.0 square metres residential gross floor area; 20,111.0 square metres non-residential gross floor area. This site plan application is associated with the recently approved (LPAT Settle… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: On-going planning application at 489-539 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 489-539 KING ST W
- application_address
- 539 KING ST W
533 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 159483 STE 20 OZ · submitted 20 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25602 (Allied REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25602: ZBA submission for 489-539 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 159483 STE 20 OZ at 533 King St W: Revised Zoning Amendment application for residential, office and restaurant/retail uses in a single building form of varying heights framing a large publicly accessible open courtyard. Please note that the property at 485 King Street West (initially part of the site with an existing heritage buildi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA submission for 489-539 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 489-539 KING ST W
- application_address
- 539 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.