Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
467 Spadina Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69043, -79.41321
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 9 | 1 | 16 November 2020 |
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 22 April 2014 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30865 | SpiceCart Investments | 467 Spadina Road | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 14 September 2020 – 27 February 2025 | 9 |
| SM20330 | 467 Spadina Limited | 467 Spadina Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 April 2014 – 23 March 2015 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 19 March 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0365/21TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 22 May 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 172305 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0365/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 19 March 2021 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| 13 172305 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 May 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
467 Spadina Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0365/21TEY · submitted 19 March 2021 · Application Withdrawn · from registration SM30865 (SpiceCart Investments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30865: 467 Spadina Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0365/21TEY at 467 Spadina Rd: Proposal to alter the lawfully existing building by constructing interior alterations to convert the use back to a seventeen unit apartment building containing two bedrooms per unit. Scope of work includes proposed common areas in the basement. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 467 Spadina Road
Matched fields
- address
- 467 SPADINA RD
- application_address
- 467 SPADINA RD
467 Spadina Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 172305 STE 22 OZ · submitted 22 May 2013 · Closed · from registration SM20330 (467 Spadina Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20330: 467 Spadina Road - OPA, Minor Variance, and Rental Residential Demolition application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 172305 STE 22 OZ at 467 Spadina Rd: To redevelop the existing four-storey apartment building by removing the existing 17 two bedroom rental units in lieu of 31 new units (22 one-bedroom, 5 two-bedroom and 4 three-bedroom.) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 467 Spadina Road - OPA, Minor Variance, and Rental Residential Demolition application
Matched fields
- address
- 467 SPADINA RD
- application_address
- 467 SPADINA RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.