Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
466 Dovercourt Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65398, -79.42679
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 20 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 54 | 17 | 11 April 2018 |
| Economic Development & Culture Division | City staff | 49 | 5 | 11 April 2018 |
| City Solicitor | City staff | 47 | 12 | 27 October 2015 |
| Ana Bailao | Councillor staff | 38 | 11 | 13 December 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Ana Bailao, Ward 18 | Councillor staff | 34 | 8 | 11 April 2018 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 18 | 1 | 5 December 2017 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 8 | 0 | 3 April 2017 |
| Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 7 | 0 | 28 February 2017 |
| Mike Layton | Councillor staff | 6 | 2 | 17 September 2015 |
| Office of Ana Bailao, Ward 18, Davenport | Councillor staff | 5 | 2 | 9 June 2015 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 5 | 5 | 19 May 2017 |
| Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 4 | 0 | 28 February 2017 |
| Ward 32 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 4 | 0 | 28 February 2017 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 4 | 3 | 24 September 2020 |
| Municipal Licensing and Standards | City staff | 2 | 1 | 5 April 2018 |
| Mayor's office | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 15 September 2015 |
| Economic Development and Culture | City staff | 1 | 1 | 9 June 2015 |
| Entertainment Ind., Economic Dvlpmt and Culture | City staff | 1 | 1 | 9 June 2015 |
| Office of Mike Layton | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 9 June 2015 |
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 22 January 2017 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM28805 | 466DCR Urban Properties Inc. | 466 Dovercourt Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 4 September 2019 – 1 June 2021 | 4 |
| SM28807 | 466DCR Urban Properties Inc. | 466 Dovercourt Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium; Planning and Development, Combined Appli… | 3 September 2019 – 31 December 2019 | 0 |
| SM22689 | The Matador Corporation | 466 Dovercourt Road. | Building Permits; Building Inspection; Licences / Licensing | 20 January 2016 – 31 December 2018 | 190 |
| SM21893 | The Matador Corporation | 466 Dovercourt Road | Arts / Culture; Licences / Licensing; Planning and Development, Heritage | 2 June 2015 – 30 June 2016 | 2 |
| SM21348 | The Matador Corporation | 466 Dovercourt Road | Licences / Licensing | 30 January 2015 – 30 December 2015 | 11 |
| SM21327 | The Matador Corporation | 466 Dovercourt Road | Licences / Licensing | 27 January 2015 – 27 October 2015 | 84 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 16 November 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1014/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 264170 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1014/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 16 November 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 19 264170 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
466 Dovercourt Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 264170 STE 09 OZ · submitted 23 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28805 (466DCR Urban Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28805: Support for a mixed-use commercial and residential development at 466 Dovercourt Road, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 264170 STE 09 OZ at 466 Dovercourt Rd: Offical Plan and Zoning By'law Amendments to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 6-storey mixed-use building: 30 dwelling units, commercial and retail uses on ground floor, mezzanine and basement levels of the new building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Support for a mixed-use commercial and residential development at 466 Dovercourt Road, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 466 DOVERCOURT RD
- application_address
- 466 DOVERCOURT RD
466 Dovercourt Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 264170 STE 09 OZ · submitted 23 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28806 (466DCR Urban Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28806: 466/468 Dovercourt Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 264170 STE 09 OZ at 466 Dovercourt Rd: Offical Plan and Zoning By'law Amendments to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 6-storey mixed-use building: 30 dwelling units, commercial and retail uses on ground floor, mezzanine and basement levels of the new building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 466/468 Dovercourt Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 468 DOVERCOURT RD
- application_address
- 466 DOVERCOURT RD
466 Dovercourt Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 264170 STE 09 OZ · submitted 23 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28807 (466DCR Urban Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28807: 466 Dovercourt Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 264170 STE 09 OZ at 466 Dovercourt Rd: Offical Plan and Zoning By'law Amendments to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 6-storey mixed-use building: 30 dwelling units, commercial and retail uses on ground floor, mezzanine and basement levels of the new building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 466 Dovercourt Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 466 DOVERCOURT RD
- application_address
- 466 DOVERCOURT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.