Address · Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
4569 Kingston Rd
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Location
- 43.77295, -79.18434
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25157 | Mutual Development Coropration | 4569 Kingston Rd | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 13 October 2017 – 12 October 2018 | 0 |
| SM25136 | Mutual Development Corporation | 4569 Kingston Rd | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 11 October 2017 – 1 July 2024 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 31 January 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 111327 ESC 25 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 December 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 273164 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 June 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 167524 ESC 44 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 111327 ESC 25 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 31 January 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 273164 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 167524 ESC 44 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 June 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
4569 Kingston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 273164 ESC 44 SA · submitted 8 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25136 (Mutual Development Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25136: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 273164 ESC 44 SA at 4569 Kingston Rd: Site Plan Control application to enable the development of a proposed 11-storey (34.3 m) tall mixed use building, with a 4-storey building section towards the rear portion of the site that includes an outdoor rooftop amenity area on the 5th floor. The proposal includes of 101 residential units with… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3
Matched fields
- address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
4569 Kingston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 273164 ESC 44 SA · submitted 8 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25157 (Mutual Development Coropration)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25157: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 273164 ESC 44 SA at 4569 Kingston Rd: Site Plan Control application to enable the development of a proposed 11-storey (34.3 m) tall mixed use building, with a 4-storey building section towards the rear portion of the site that includes an outdoor rooftop amenity area on the 5th floor. The proposal includes of 101 residential units with… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3
Matched fields
- address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
4569 Kingston Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 167524 ESC 44 OZ · submitted 3 June 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25136 (Mutual Development Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25136: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 167524 ESC 44 OZ at 4569 Kingston Rd: Zoning by-law amendment for a proposed 11-storey (34.3 m) tall mixed use building, with a 4-storey building section towards the rear portion of the site that includes an outdoor rooftop amenity area on the 5th floor. The existing zoning permits maximum building heights of 8-storeys plus rooftop mec… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3
Matched fields
- address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
4569 Kingston Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 167524 ESC 44 OZ · submitted 3 June 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25157 (Mutual Development Coropration)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25157: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 167524 ESC 44 OZ at 4569 Kingston Rd: Zoning by-law amendment for a proposed 11-storey (34.3 m) tall mixed use building, with a 4-storey building section towards the rear portion of the site that includes an outdoor rooftop amenity area on the 5th floor. The existing zoning permits maximum building heights of 8-storeys plus rooftop mec… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning for 4569 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, ON M1E 2P3
Matched fields
- address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 4569 KINGSTON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25
4 lobbied · 18 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25
3 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.