Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
425 Cherry St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65211, -79.35743
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
15- Submitted 8 January 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 102488 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 July 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 181818 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 May 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0478/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 February 2020Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 20 112399 STE 13 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 September 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 215798 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 December 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 270052 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 April 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 162077 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 November 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 314600 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 November 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 314634 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 November 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 305223 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 August 2011Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 11 253735 STE 28 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 July 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 223770 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2008Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 08 231376 STE 28 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 231384 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 231387 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 15 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 102488 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 8 January 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 181818 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 8 July 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0478/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 May 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 20 112399 STE 13 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 5 February 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 215798 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 September 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 270052 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 162077 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 April 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 314600 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 314634 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 305223 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 253735 STE 28 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 9 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 223770 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 July 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 231376 STE 28 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 22 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 231384 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 231387 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 13
2 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.