Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
4155 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.74719, -79.40705
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 6 September 2017 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 6 September 2017 |
| Jaye Robinson Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 21 August 2013 |
| Office of Councillor Robinson | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 30 August 2017 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24981 | 2519371 Ontario Inc. | 4155 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 25 August 2017 – 24 August 2018 | 4 |
| SM19610 | National Homes Inc. | 4155 Yonge Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 26 August 2013 – 26 August 2014 | 1 |
| SM19583 | Pattison Outdoor Advertising | 4155 Yonge Street | Signs | 19 August 2013 – 28 February 2014 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 10 October 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 245489 NNY 25 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 August 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 227529 NNY 25 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 February 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 133752 NNY 25 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 245489 NNY 25 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 October 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 227529 NNY 25 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 August 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 133752 NNY 25 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 February 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
4155 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 245489 NNY 25 OZ · submitted 10 October 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24981 (2519371 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.97
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24981: Development application at 4155 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 245489 NNY 25 OZ at 4155 Yonge St: Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By Law amendment to construct a 14 storey residential building on the western portion of the subject site. The proposed building would be constructed over the existing TTC subway tunnel andbe setback 1.0 metre from the toe-of-slope of valley feature. The proposed … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application at 4155 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 4155 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 4155 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 15% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 30% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.