Address · Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
37 Kecala Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Location
- 43.75416, -79.27945
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 11 October 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Thompson | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 18 November 2014 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22243 | Feeley Group | 37 Kecala Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Consent … | 18 September 2015 – 9 April 2020 | 2 |
| SM21050 | Aspen Way Investments Ltd | 37 Kecala Road. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 17 November 2014 – 17 November 2016 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 1 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0415/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 April 2015Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0023/15SCClosed · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0415/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| B0023/15SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 20 April 2015 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
37 Kecala Rd · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0023/15SC · submitted 20 April 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22243 (Feeley Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM22243: Zoning By-Law Amendment and Consent Application, 37 Kecala Road, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0023/15SC at 37 Kecala Rd: This application is for a proposal to sever the land at 37 Kecala Road into eight residential lots, each having frontage on Kecala Road as shown on the attached Lot Division Plan. New detached dwellings are proposed on seven of the proposed lots, shown as Lots 1 to 7. The existing heritage listed b… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-Law Amendment and Consent Application, 37 Kecala Road, City of Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 37 KECALA RD
- application_address
- 37 KECALA RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 21
3 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 21
3 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.