lobbyTO

Address · Ward 25 · Neethan Shan

3693 Ellesmere Rd

Registrations naming this address
0
Communications on those registrations
0
Applications at this address
13
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
Location
43.79036, -79.17115
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

0

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

13
Data table· 13 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
B0065/18SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)26 November 2018Closed
Approved
A0361/18SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)23 November 2018Closed
Approved
A0362/18SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)23 November 2018Closed
Approved
COA-4490539
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)23 November 2018Cancelled
Withdrawn
COA-4490561
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)23 November 2018Cancelled
Withdrawn
A0017/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)19 January 2017Closed
Approved
A0018/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)19 January 2017Closed
Approved
A0019/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)19 January 2017Closed
Approved
A0020/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)19 January 2017Closed
Approved
A0021/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)19 January 2017Closed
Approved
B0002/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)19 January 2017Closed
Approved
COA-4094543
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)19 January 2017Cancelled
Withdrawn
COA-4094558
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)19 January 2017Cancelled
Withdrawn

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 2 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 25

1 lobbied · 9 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 25: 1 lobbied and 9 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied9Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.