Address · Ward 25 · Neethan Shan

363 Old Kingston Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 5; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
Location: 43.78323, -79.17030
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Awan Group Developers Inc.SM25665 · 26 February 20183
Awan Developer GroupSM29112 · 4 November 20192

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 44 Scarborough East3
Ward 251
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge Park1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 44 Scarborough East	Member of council	3	3	26 February 2018
Ward 25	Councillor staff	1	1	4 November 2019
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge Park	Member of council	1	0	2 April 2020

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM29112	Awan Developer Group	363 Old Kingston Road	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	4 November 2019 – 4 November 2021	2
SM25665	Awan Group Developers Inc.	363 Old Kingston Road.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	26 February 2018 – 26 February 2018	3

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 19 February 2026Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 26 118747 ESC 25 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Submitted 21 June 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 201252 ESC 44 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 21 June 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 201690 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
26 118747 ESC 25 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	19 February 2026	OMB Appeal In progress
10 201252 ESC 44 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	21 June 2010	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
10 201690 ESC 44 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	21 June 2010	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25

3 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25: 3 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25

4 lobbied · 18 matched