Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
30 Tippett Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.73299, -79.44824
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 9 | 8 | 23 July 2018 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 21 June 2016 |
| Ward 10 York Centre | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 10 November 2015 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 5 July 2022 |
| James Pasternak | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 3 February 2023 |
| Office of Councillor Pasternak, Ward 10 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 23 July 2018 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 9 February 2012 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 February 2012 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33340 | Collecdev Inc. | 30 Tippett Rd | Planning and Development | 8 June 2022 – 7 July 2023 | 4 |
| SM26529 | Tippett South Inc. | 30 Tippett Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 23 July 2018 – 4 October 2021 | 2 |
| SM23319 | Build Toronto Holdings (Tippett) Inc. | 30 Tippett Road | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 21 June 2016 – 21 June 2019 | 1 |
| SM22378 | Shiplake Management Company | 30 Tippett Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 23 October 2015 – 20 July 2017 | 8 |
| SM17766 | City of Toronto | 30 Tippett Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 1 February 2012 – 5 February 2019 | 7 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
12- Submitted 6 December 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0783/22NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 9 December 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 246679 NNY 06 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 150618 NNY 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 August 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 214838 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 6 July 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 185908 NNY 10 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 28 June 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 181970 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 June 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0569/16NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 September 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 220939 NNY 10 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 December 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 294187 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 November 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 312374 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 November 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 289554 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 April 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 163808 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 12 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0783/22NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 December 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 246679 NNY 06 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 9 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 150618 NNY 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 214838 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 August 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 185908 NNY 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 July 2016 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| 16 181970 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 June 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0569/16NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 16 June 2016 | Closed Approved |
| 15 220939 NNY 10 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 10 September 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 294187 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 December 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 312374 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 289554 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 November 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 163808 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 April 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
30 Tippett Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0783/22NY · submitted 6 December 2022 · Closed · from registration SM33340 (Collecdev Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33340: 18 & 30 Tretti Way (formerly 30 Tippett Rd) - Committee of Adjustment application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0783/22NY at 30 Tippett Rd: Proposal to reduce retail gross floor area requirements, convert retail space into 16 dwelling units and reduce parking requirements. Please note this application was deferred on February 16th, 2023 in order to conduct revisions to the public notice. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 18 & 30 Tretti Way (formerly 30 Tippett Rd) - Committee of Adjustment application
Matched fields
- address
- 30 TIPPETT RD
- application_address
- 30 TIPPETT RD
30 Tippett Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 294187 NNY 10 OZ · submitted 14 December 2012 · Closed · from registration SM22378 (Shiplake Management Company)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22378: 30 Tippett Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 294187 NNY 10 OZ at 30 Tippett Rd: This application has been submitted in support of an Official Plan Amendment application submitted in November 2011. Proposed are two condominium apartment buildings of 13 and 12 storeys located on the western portion of the site having a total of 290 dwelling units including 22 live-work units. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 30 Tippett Road
Matched fields
- address
- 30 TIPPETT RD
- application_address
- 30 TIPPETT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 6
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.