Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
30 Meadowglen Pl
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Location
- 43.77477, -79.23050
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 11 December 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 267198 ESC 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 June 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 176491 ESC 38 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 267198 ESC 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 11 December 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 176491 ESC 38 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 June 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1-2 Meadowglen Pl · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 176491 ESC 38 OZ · submitted 27 June 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11226 (R.A.B. Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11226: 1 & 2 Meadowglen Place (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 176491 ESC 38 OZ at 1-2 Meadowglen Pl: The original application proposed a zoning by-law amendment and sought rental housing demolition and replacement approval to permit the redevelopment of the site with a total of 886 residential units ranging in buildings from 10 to 32 storeys in height, ground floor retail and a public parkette. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1 & 2 Meadowglen Place
Matched fields
- address
- 1&2 MEADOWGLEN PL
- application_address
- 1-2 MEADOWGLEN PL
1-2 Meadowglen Pl · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 176491 ESC 38 OZ · submitted 27 June 2008 · Closed · from registration SM12799 (R.A.B. Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12799: 1 & 2 Meadowglen Place redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 176491 ESC 38 OZ at 1-2 Meadowglen Pl: The original application proposed a zoning by-law amendment and sought rental housing demolition and replacement approval to permit the redevelopment of the site with a total of 886 residential units ranging in buildings from 10 to 32 storeys in height, ground floor retail and a public parkette. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1 & 2 Meadowglen Place redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 1&2 MEADOWGLEN PL
- application_address
- 1-2 MEADOWGLEN PL
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 24
6 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24
8 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.