Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
3 Swift Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.72668, -79.31781
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 1 February 2024 |
| Chris Moise | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 29 January 2024 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 29 January 2024 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 29 January 2024 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35254 | Republic Developments Inc. | 3 Swift Drive | Planning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion; Planning and Development Applica… | 29 January 2024 – 9 February 2024 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 24 December 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 251396 NNY 16 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 24 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 251397 NNY 16 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 251396 NNY 16 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 December 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 251397 NNY 16 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
3 Swift Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 251397 NNY 16 OZ · submitted 24 December 2021 · Closed · from registration SM35254 (Republic Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35254: 3 Swift Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 251397 NNY 16 OZ at 3 Swift Dr: Amend the Zoning By-law to permit 35 and 31-storey towers on a 7-storey podium. 518.9 sq.m. public park, 268 sq.m. POPS. 857 residential units of which 61 units are rental replacement. Total GFA of 55,368.5 sq.m.; FSI pf 10.67. Implementing ZBL pending conditions - August 5, 2025. August 7, 2025 - … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3 Swift Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 3 SWIFT DR
- application_address
- 3 SWIFT DR
Council and committee items naming this address
- 3 Swift Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - Approval2024.NY10.5 · 24 January 2024
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.