Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
2992 Sheppard Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Location
- 43.77660, -79.31860
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 26 April 2018 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26998 | Ambria Homes Inc. | 2992 Sheppard Avenue East. | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 12 November 2018 – 29 October 2022 | 0 |
| SM25148 | Ambria Group | 2992 Sheppard Ave. E. | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 11 October 2017 – 11 October 2019 | 3 |
| SM25150 | Ambria Group | 2992 Sheppard Ave. E. | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 11 October 2017 – 11 October 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 9 July 2026Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 26 198879 ESC 22 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 4 February 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0021/26SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 August 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0191/23SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 August 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 183133 ESC 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 February 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0054/18SCApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 15 June 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 196224 ESC 40 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 June 2009Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 09 143729 ESC 40 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 198879 ESC 22 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 9 July 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| A0021/26SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 February 2026 | Closed Approved |
| A0191/23SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 August 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 23 183133 ESC 22 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 August 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0054/18SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 February 2018 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| 10 196224 ESC 40 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 June 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 143729 ESC 40 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 June 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2992 Sheppard Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0054/18SC · submitted 14 February 2018 · Application Withdrawn · from registration SM25148 (Ambria Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25148: Application for minor variance in support of redevelopment of 2992 Sheppard Ave. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0054/18SC at 2992 Sheppard Ave E: To construct an 18 storey residential condominium building with 160 dwelling units, ground floor retail, underground parking and to permit an on-site sales office. The lands known as 2002 Pharmacy Avenue and 2992 Sheppard Avenue East are subject to site specific Zoning By-law No. 45-2011 enacted by… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application for minor variance in support of redevelopment of 2992 Sheppard Ave. E.
Matched fields
- address
- 2992 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 2992 SHEPPARD AVE E
2992 Sheppard Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0054/18SC · submitted 14 February 2018 · Application Withdrawn · from registration SM25150 (Ambria Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25150: Application in support of redevelopment of 2992 Sheppard Ave. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0054/18SC at 2992 Sheppard Ave E: To construct an 18 storey residential condominium building with 160 dwelling units, ground floor retail, underground parking and to permit an on-site sales office. The lands known as 2002 Pharmacy Avenue and 2992 Sheppard Avenue East are subject to site specific Zoning By-law No. 45-2011 enacted by… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 2992 Sheppard Ave. E.
Matched fields
- address
- 2992 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 2992 SHEPPARD AVE E
2992 Sheppard Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0054/18SC · submitted 14 February 2018 · Application Withdrawn · from registration SM26998 (Ambria Homes Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26998: Discussions about a property at 2992 Sheppard Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0054/18SC at 2992 Sheppard Ave E: To construct an 18 storey residential condominium building with 160 dwelling units, ground floor retail, underground parking and to permit an on-site sales office. The lands known as 2002 Pharmacy Avenue and 2992 Sheppard Avenue East are subject to site specific Zoning By-law No. 45-2011 enacted by… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discussions about a property at 2992 Sheppard Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 2992 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 2992 SHEPPARD AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 22
1 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22
7 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22
6 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.