Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
295 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64759, -79.39076
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 21 February 2013 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 November 2014 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM21055 | Pinnacle (Adelaide Plaza One) Development Partnership | 295 Adelaide Street West. | Real Estate / Property (City-owned) | 17 November 2014 – 12 December 2014 | 1 |
| SM18922 | Pinnacle International (Adelaide St.) Ltd. | 295 Adelaide Street West. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 February 2013 – 5 February 2014 | 1 |
| SM18726 | Mondiale Development LTD. | 295 Adelaide St. W. | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 5 December 2012 – 30 November 2026 | 0 |
| SM17167 | Pinnacle International | 295 Adelaide St. West | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 13 September 2011 – 13 September 2016 | 0 |
| SM11685 | Pinnacle International (Ontario) Ltd. | 295 Adelaide Street West | Planning Application - Zoning By-law | 6 May 2008 – 18 September 2019 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 6 August 2013Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 13 216126 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 17 June 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 150758 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 June 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 164515 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 216126 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 August 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 150758 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 June 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 164515 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 June 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
295 Adelaide St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 164515 STE 20 OZ · submitted 2 June 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11685 (Pinnacle International (Ontario) Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11685: 295 Adelaide Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 164515 STE 20 OZ at 295 Adelaide St W: Rezoning applicaiton to permit the re-development of the site for an 8 and 46 storey building on the lands containing 587 residential units, and 375 vehicluar parking spaces below grade. Included in the proposal is the retention but relocation of the existing heritage structure at 104 John Street t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 295 Adelaide Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 295 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 295 ADELAIDE ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.