Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
2901 Bayview Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.76920, -79.38603
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 12 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 27 | 7 | 11 February 2026 |
| Ward 17 Don Valley North | Member of council | 17 | 17 | 18 May 2022 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 9 | 6 | 13 November 2018 |
| Shelley Carroll | Member of council | 8 | 4 | 26 August 2024 |
| Councillor Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 4 | 4 | 18 May 2022 |
| Councillor Carroll, Ward 17 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 13 May 2019 |
| Councillor Carroll, ward 17 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 13 May 2019 |
| Councillor Shiner, Ward 24 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 12 July 2017 |
| Shelley Carol | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 20 January 2026 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 25 June 2020 |
| Councilor Carol | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 23 April 2025 |
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 January 2018 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34672 | QuadReal Property Group Limited Partnership | 2901 Bayview Avenue. | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 26 July 2023 – 1 February 2027 | 0 |
| SM24051 | QuadReal Property Group Limited Partnership | 2901 Bayview Avenue | By-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development … | 23 February 2017 – 31 December 2026 | 75 |
| SM22248 | Bentall Kennedy | 2901 Bayview Ave | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 21 September 2015 – 22 September 2020 | 2 |
| SM12912 | Orlando Corporation | 2901 Bayview Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 7 April 2009 – 31 December 2010 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
9- Submitted 11 December 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 265324 NNY 17 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 22 April 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0190/25NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 February 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0102/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 210382 NNY 17 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 210389 NNY 17 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 22 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 209869 NNY 17 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 30 September 2020Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 20 200970 NNY 17 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 31 July 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 208789 NNY 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 August 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 253762 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 9 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 265324 NNY 17 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 December 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| A0190/25NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 April 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0102/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 20 210382 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 210389 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 October 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 209869 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 October 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 200970 NNY 17 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 30 September 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 17 208789 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 July 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 253762 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
630 Sheppard Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 208789 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 31 July 2017 · Closed · from registration SM22248 (Bentall Kennedy)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22248: Bayview Village Redevelopment intersection of Bayview and Sheppard Avenues 2901 Bayview Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 208789 NNY 24 OZ at 630 Sheppard Ave E: Bayview Village development including two development sites (North and South). The North site is located at Bayview Mews and Hawksbury Drive, and is proposed to include one 20-storey mixed use building; two 6-storey mixed use buildings; and a retail addition to the existing Bayview Village Shopping… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Bayview Village Redevelopment intersection of Bayview and Sheppard Avenues 2901 Bayview Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 2901 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 2901 BAYVIEW AVE
630 Sheppard Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 208789 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 31 July 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24051 (QuadReal Property Group Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24051: Lobbying for rezoning and official plan amendments for the following project: Bayview Village (2901 Bayview Avenue). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 208789 NNY 24 OZ at 630 Sheppard Ave E: Bayview Village development including two development sites (North and South). The North site is located at Bayview Mews and Hawksbury Drive, and is proposed to include one 20-storey mixed use building; two 6-storey mixed use buildings; and a retail addition to the existing Bayview Village Shopping… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying for rezoning and official plan amendments for the following project: Bayview Village (2901 Bayview Avenue).
Matched fields
- address
- 2901 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 2901 BAYVIEW AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 17
2 lobbied · 54 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 54 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 17
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.