Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
275 Albany Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67378, -79.41317
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 0 | 11 January 2022 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 5 February 2018 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 19 April 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24385 | Tridel Group of Companies | 275 Albany Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 19 April 2017 – 19 April 2018 | 2 |
| SM22679 | Deltera Inc. | 275 Albany Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 19 January 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 9 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 23 October 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 210283 STE 11 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 July 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 193621 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 November 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 256733 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 210283 STE 11 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 23 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 193621 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 July 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 256733 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 November 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
275 Albany Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 193621 STE 20 SA · submitted 19 July 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24385 (Tridel Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24385: Redevelopment of 420 Dupont St. & 275 Albany Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 193621 STE 20 SA at 275 Albany Ave: Application for official plan amendment and rezoning in order to permit the redevelopment of the Site for a 9-storey mixeduse development comprising approximately 245 condominium apartments and 2097 square metres of grade related retail space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 420 Dupont St. & 275 Albany Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 420 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 420 DUPONT ST
420 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 256733 STE 20 OZ · submitted 25 November 2015 · Closed · from registration SM24385 (Tridel Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24385: Redevelopment of 420 Dupont St. & 275 Albany Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 256733 STE 20 OZ at 420 Dupont St: Application for official plan amendment and rezoning in order to permit the redevelopment of the Site for a 12-storey mixeduse development comprising approximately 296 condominium apartments and 2301 square metres of grade related retail space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 420 Dupont St. & 275 Albany Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 420 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 420 DUPONT ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.