Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
27 Bathurst St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64106, -79.40120
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 14 May 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 158160 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 May 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 158181 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 June 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 203308 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 June 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 230641 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 158160 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 May 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 158181 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 May 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 203308 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 June 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 230641 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 June 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
578 Front St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 203308 STE 20 SA · submitted 29 June 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17780 (Minto Urban Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17780: Proposed development applications for a mixed use condominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 203308 STE 20 SA at 578 Front St W: Site Plan application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use development with a total gross floor area of 79992m2 consisting of 1200 residential dwelling units in four towers ranging in height from 2 to 18 stories with retail at grade. Included in the proposal … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …lications for a mixed use condominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street.
- particulars: …ominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 49 NIAGARA ST
- application_address
- 49 NIAGARA ST
578 Front St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 203308 STE 20 SA · submitted 29 June 2012 · Closed · from registration SM20906 (Minto Communities Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20906: Bathurst and Front Street 578-580 Front Street 25-31 Bathurst Street 33-49 Niagara Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 203308 STE 20 SA at 578 Front St W: Site Plan application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use development with a total gross floor area of 79992m2 consisting of 1200 residential dwelling units in four towers ranging in height from 2 to 18 stories with retail at grade. Included in the proposal … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Bathurst and Front Street 578-580 Front Street 25-31 Bathurst Street 33-49 Niagara Street
Matched fields
- address
- 25-31 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 25 BATHURST ST
27 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 230641 STE 20 OZ · submitted 30 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM16228 (Minto BF Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16228: Pending development applications for a mixed use condominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street West, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 230641 STE 20 OZ at 27 Bathurst St: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use development with a total gross floor area of 79992m2 consisting of 1200 residential dwelling units in four towers ranging in height from 2 to 18 stories with retail at grade. Included in the proposal i… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pending development applications for a mixed use condominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street West, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 580 FRONT ST W
- application_address
- 580 FRONT ST W
27 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 230641 STE 20 OZ · submitted 30 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17780 (Minto Urban Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17780: Proposed development applications for a mixed use condominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 230641 STE 20 OZ at 27 Bathurst St: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use development with a total gross floor area of 79992m2 consisting of 1200 residential dwelling units in four towers ranging in height from 2 to 18 stories with retail at grade. Included in the proposal i… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …lications for a mixed use condominium development on the properties municipally known as 578 to 580 Front Street, 25 to 31 Bathurst Street, and 33 to 49 Niagara Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 31 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 31 BATHURST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.