Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
244 King St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65164, -79.36747
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 21 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 228810 STE 13 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 28 June 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 176715 STE 13 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 22 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 233160 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 228810 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 21 October 2021 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 21 176715 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 June 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 20 233160 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
234 King St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 233160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 22 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30924 (Emblem Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30924: 234-250 King st East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233160 STE 13 OZ at 234 King St E: The City has received an application to amend the Zoning By-law to allow a 40-storey (123.1 metres plus a 9.75-metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with ground level retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 234-250 King st East
Matched fields
- address
- 234-250 KING ST E
- application_address
- 234 KING ST E
234 King St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 233160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 22 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM31070 (Emblem Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31070: 234 - 250 King Street E (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233160 STE 13 OZ at 234 King St E: The City has received an application to amend the Zoning By-law to allow a 40-storey (123.1 metres plus a 9.75-metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with ground level retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 234 - 250 King Street E
Matched fields
- address
- 234-250 KING ST E
- application_address
- 234 KING ST E
234 King St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 233160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 22 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM31085 (Emblem Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31085: Zoning By-law amendment for site located at 234-250 King Street East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233160 STE 13 OZ at 234 King St E: The City has received an application to amend the Zoning By-law to allow a 40-storey (123.1 metres plus a 9.75-metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with ground level retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law amendment for site located at 234-250 King Street East.
Matched fields
- address
- 234-250 KING ST E
- application_address
- 234 KING ST E
234 King St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 233160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 22 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM31088 (Emblem Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31088: Zoning By-law amendment for site located at 234-250 King Street East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233160 STE 13 OZ at 234 King St E: The City has received an application to amend the Zoning By-law to allow a 40-storey (123.1 metres plus a 9.75-metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with ground level retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law amendment for site located at 234-250 King Street East.
Matched fields
- address
- 234-250 KING ST E
- application_address
- 234 KING ST E
234 King St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 233160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 22 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM31090 (Emblem Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31090: Zoning By-law amendment for site located at 234-250 King Street East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233160 STE 13 OZ at 234 King St E: The City has received an application to amend the Zoning By-law to allow a 40-storey (123.1 metres plus a 9.75-metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with ground level retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law amendment for site located at 234-250 King Street East.
Matched fields
- address
- 234-250 KING ST E
- application_address
- 234 KING ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.