Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers

240 Alton Towers Crcl

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 2; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
Location: 43.82624, -79.27736
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 16 November 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0342/16SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 5 July 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 185123 ESC 41 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0342/16SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	16 November 2016	Closed Approved
16 185123 ESC 41 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	5 July 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

240 Alton Towers Crcl · Minor variance (MV)
A0342/16SC · submitted 16 November 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23535 (Cedar City Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23535: 240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0342/16SC at 240 Alton Towers Crcl: To permit a free-standing, drive-through restaurant at the northeast corner of the Milliken Wells Shopping Centre. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle
Matched fields
address
240&250 ALTON TOWERS CIR
application_address
240 ALTON TOWERS CIR
240 Alton Towers Crcl · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 185123 ESC 41 SA · submitted 5 July 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23535 (Cedar City Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23535: 240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 185123 ESC 41 SA at 240 Alton Towers Crcl: This is a Site Plan Control application for a stand alone commercial building (restaurant) with a drive-thru facility. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle
Matched fields
address
240&250 ALTON TOWERS CIR
application_address
240 ALTON TOWERS CIR

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23

3 lobbied · 32 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23: 3 lobbied and 32 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	32	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23

2 lobbied · 2 matched