Address · Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
2345 Finch Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Location
- 43.75183, -79.54174
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 7 York West | Member of council | 4 | 3 | 22 June 2015 |
| Councillor Mammoliti | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 22 June 2015 |
| Office of Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 30 July 2014 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM20448 | 3415 Weston Road Limited | 2345 Finch Avenue West. | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Consent to Sever; Transportation - Roads / … | 20 May 2014 – 20 November 2014 | 3 |
| SM11232 | Medallion Developments Inc. | 2345 Finch Avenue West. | Planning and Development - Site Plan and Zoning Application | 27 February 2008 – 17 October 2017 | 3 |
| SM11235 | Medallion Developments Inc. | 2345 Finch Avenue West. | Planning and Development - Planning Applications - Site Plan and Zoning Amendment | 27 February 2008 – 27 February 2010 | 0 |
| SM11907 | Medallion Developments Inc. | 2345 Finch Avenue West | Planning and Development - Planning Applications - Site Plan and Zoning Amendment | 27 February 2008 – 31 December 2008 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 18 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 230600 WET 07 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 230600 WET 07 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 December 2020 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.