Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
2221 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.70601, -79.39783
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 29 June 2017 |
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 November 2012 |
| Councillor Matlow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 15 June 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Matlow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 2 November 2012 |
| Office of Councillor Matlow, Ward 22 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 26 November 2012 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24416 | 2221 Holdings Incorporated | 2221 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 26 April 2017 – 29 December 2020 | 7 |
| SM18698 | 2221 Yonge Holdings Inc. | 2221 Yonge Street. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 14 November 2012 – 12 November 2021 | 2 |
| SM18653 | 2221 Yonge Holdings Inc. | 2221 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 1 November 2012 – 31 December 2015 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 23 October 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 239908 STE 12 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 7 May 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 153399 STE 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 December 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 296517 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 239908 STE 12 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 23 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 153399 STE 22 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 7 May 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 296517 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 December 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2221 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 296517 STE 22 OZ · submitted 20 December 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18653 (2221 Yonge Holdings Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18653: 2221 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 296517 STE 22 OZ at 2221 Yonge St: Proposed 56 storey mixed used building with 560 dwelling units, and provide for eight levels of underground parking with 306 parking spaces. A total of 591 bicycle parking spaceswill be provided. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2221 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 2221 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2221 YONGE ST
2221 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 296517 STE 22 OZ · submitted 20 December 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18698 (2221 Yonge Holdings Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18698: Proposal to redevelop 2221 Yonge Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 296517 STE 22 OZ at 2221 Yonge St: Proposed 56 storey mixed used building with 560 dwelling units, and provide for eight levels of underground parking with 306 parking spaces. A total of 591 bicycle parking spaceswill be provided. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal to redevelop 2221 Yonge Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 2221 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2221 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.