Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
22 Elm St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.65782, -79.38304
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 27 September 2016 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22655 | UNITE HERE Local 75 | 22 Elm Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 13 January 2016 – 31 December 2017 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 5 November 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 234931 STE 11 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 December 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 261101 STE 11 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 30 September 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 230523 STE 27 OZAppeal Received · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 234931 STE 11 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 5 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 261101 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 December 2019 | Under Review In progress |
| 15 230523 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 September 2015 | Appeal Received In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
33 Gerrard St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 261101 STE 11 SA · submitted 13 December 2019 · Under Review · from registration SM30431 (Great Eagle Hotels (Canada) Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30431: Obtain a mutual traffic resolution between the City and Great Eagle as it relates to traffic impacts due to proposed YongeTOmorrow Environmental assessment to our development at 33 Gerrard Street West, and to secure the Site Plan Application Approval for (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 261101 STE 11 SA at 33 Gerrard St W: INACTIVE Proposal to construct 3 towers (85-storeys, 51-storeys, and 32-storeys) and one 5-storey building comprised of residential, commercial, and community uses including a POPS. A total of 1709 dwelling units and 39,099 m² of non-residential floor area are proposed along with 473 below grade pa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …eat Eagle as it relates to traffic impacts due to proposed YongeTOmorrow Environmental assessment to our development at 33 Gerrard Street West, and to secure the Site Plan Application Approval for
Matched fields
- address
- 33 GERRARD ST W
- application_address
- 33 GERRARD ST W
33 Gerrard St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 261101 STE 11 SA · submitted 13 December 2019 · Under Review · from registration SM30866 (The Great Eagle Development and Project Management Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30866: Assisting with the planning and zoning matters for 33 Gerrard Street West, Toronto Ontario (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 261101 STE 11 SA at 33 Gerrard St W: INACTIVE Proposal to construct 3 towers (85-storeys, 51-storeys, and 32-storeys) and one 5-storey building comprised of residential, commercial, and community uses including a POPS. A total of 1709 dwelling units and 39,099 m² of non-residential floor area are proposed along with 473 below grade pa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the planning and zoning matters for 33 Gerrard Street West, Toronto Ontario
Matched fields
- address
- 33 GERRARD ST W
- application_address
- 33 GERRARD ST W
33 Gerrard St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 230523 STE 27 OZ · submitted 30 September 2015 · Appeal Received · from registration SM22655 (UNITE HERE Local 75)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM22655: 33 Gerrard Street West and 22 Elm Street - Zoning Amendment Application (15 230523 STE 27 OZ) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 230523 STE 27 OZ at 33 Gerrard St W: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit three tall buildings (89, 90, and 31 storeys) and one 2-storey building, containing 1,980 dwelling units and 27,374 square metres of non-residential gross floor area (including 400 hotel suites). The proposal includes an east-west mews reconnecting Walt… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 33 Gerrard Street West and 22 Elm Street - Zoning Amendment Application (15 230523 STE 27 OZ)
- particulars: 33 Gerrard Street West and 22 Elm Street - Zoning Amendment Application (15 230523 STE 27 OZ)
Matched fields
- file_number
- 15 230523 STE 27 OZ
- address
- 33 GERRARD ST W
- application_address
- 33 GERRARD ST W
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 11
1 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.