Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
2000 Bathurst St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69959, -79.42532
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 9 June 2015 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM21897 | Eldebron Holdings Limited | 2000 Bathurst St | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 9 June 2015 – 4 December 2019 | 1 |
| SM19817 | Eldebron Holdings Limited | 2000 Bathurst Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 30 October 2013 – 25 May 2020 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 13 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 263773 STE 21 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 December 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 270565 STE 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 263773 STE 21 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 270565 STE 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 December 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1996 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 270565 STE 21 OZ · submitted 30 December 2015 · Closed · from registration SM19817 (Eldebron Holdings Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19817: Redevelopment of 1996-1998 and 2000 Bathurst Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 270565 STE 21 OZ at 1996 Bathurst St: ** Revised Draft By-law and Engineering drawings and functional servicing report - 10/17Application to demolish the two existing rental apartment buildings on the subject site and to construct two 6- storey rental apartment buildings. The buildings will contain a total of 112 residential units, inc… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 1996-1998 and 2000 Bathurst Street
Matched fields
- address
- 2000 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 2000 BATHURST ST
1996 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 270565 STE 21 OZ · submitted 30 December 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21897 (Eldebron Holdings Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21897: ZBA application re redevelopment of 1996, 1998 & 2000 Bathurst St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 270565 STE 21 OZ at 1996 Bathurst St: ** Revised Draft By-law and Engineering drawings and functional servicing report - 10/17Application to demolish the two existing rental apartment buildings on the subject site and to construct two 6- storey rental apartment buildings. The buildings will contain a total of 112 residential units, inc… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application re redevelopment of 1996, 1998 & 2000 Bathurst St.
Matched fields
- address
- 1998&2000 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 1998 BATHURST ST
1996 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 270565 STE 21 OZ · submitted 30 December 2015 · Closed · from registration SM24067 (Eldebron Holdings Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24067: ZBA Application in support of redevelopment of 1996-2000 Bathurst St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 270565 STE 21 OZ at 1996 Bathurst St: ** Revised Draft By-law and Engineering drawings and functional servicing report - 10/17Application to demolish the two existing rental apartment buildings on the subject site and to construct two 6- storey rental apartment buildings. The buildings will contain a total of 112 residential units, inc… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA Application in support of redevelopment of 1996-2000 Bathurst St.
Matched fields
- address
- 1996-2000 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 1996 BATHURST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.