Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
20 Maitland St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66433, -79.38303
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 13 July 2012 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 15 May 2012 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19735 | Plazacorp Investments Limited | 20 Maitland Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 7 October 2013 – 1 September 2017 | 0 |
| SM19584 | Plazacorp | 20 Maitland Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 August 2013 – 16 August 2017 | 0 |
| SM18104 | Triangle West Developments Inc. | 20 Maitland Street | Planning and Development, Heritage | 14 May 2012 – 31 December 2012 | 4 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 4 February 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0085/26TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 233900 STE 13 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 23 October 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 240160 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 October 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 240163 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0085/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 February 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 21 233900 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 November 2021 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 19 240160 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 240163 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
20 Maitland St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 240160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 23 October 2019 · Closed · from registration SM25310 (Plazacorp Investments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25310: 15 Wellesley Street East and 20-26 Maitland Street- Development Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 240160 STE 13 OZ at 20 Maitland St: LPAT approved Official Plan/Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 40 storey plus partial 41st storey (129.2 m, mechanical penthouse inclusive) mixed-use building containing 220 square metres of non-residential floor area and 502 residential dwelling uni… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 15 Wellesley Street East and 20-26 Maitland Street- Development Application
Matched fields
- address
- 20-26 MAITLAND ST
- application_address
- 20 MAITLAND ST
20 Maitland St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 240160 STE 13 OZ · submitted 23 October 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29683 (Plazacorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29683: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for site located at 20-26 Maitland Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 240160 STE 13 OZ at 20 Maitland St: LPAT approved Official Plan/Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 40 storey plus partial 41st storey (129.2 m, mechanical penthouse inclusive) mixed-use building containing 220 square metres of non-residential floor area and 502 residential dwelling uni… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for site located at 20-26 Maitland Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 20-26 MAITLAND ST
- application_address
- 20 MAITLAND ST
20 Maitland St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 240163 STE 13 SA · submitted 23 October 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29683 (Plazacorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29683: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for site located at 20-26 Maitland Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 240163 STE 13 SA at 20 Maitland St: Site Plan Approval application to facilitate the development of the site for a 40 storey plus partial 41st storey (129.2 m, mechanical penthouse inclusive) mixed-use building containing 220 square metres of non-residential floor area and 502 residential dwelling units. Related planning applications… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for site located at 20-26 Maitland Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 20-26 MAITLAND ST
- application_address
- 20 MAITLAND ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.