Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

2 Tecumseth St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 5; 3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 34; 8 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64072, -79.40591
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

TASSM27454 · 29 January 201926
TAS Tecumseth Niagara LPSM26003 · 6 April 20185
Quality Meats Packers LtdSM19017 · 6 March 20132
TAS Tecumseth Niagara LPSM27305 · 8 January 20191
TASSM36348 · 13 February 20250

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Economic Development & Culture18
John Tory6
Mayor John Tory4
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina2
Real Estate1
Joe Cressy1
Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 101
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York1

Data table· 8 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Economic Development & Culture	City staff	18	17	3 December 2020
John Tory	Councillor staff	6	6	17 November 2020
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	4	3	1 May 2018
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	2	2	2 October 2013
Real Estate	City staff	1	0	20 June 2018
Joe Cressy	Councillor staff	1	0	10 January 2019
Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10	Councillor staff	1	1	12 February 2019
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York	Member of council	1	1	12 February 2019

All registrations· 5 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM36348	TAS	2 Tecumseth Street	Affordable Housing; Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application	13 February 2025 – 31 December 2026	0
SM27454	TAS	2 Tecumseth Street	Planning and Development, Combined Application	29 January 2019 – 31 December 2023	26
SM27305	TAS Tecumseth Niagara LP	2 Tecumseth Street	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	8 January 2019 – 24 April 2019	1
SM26003	TAS Tecumseth Niagara LP	2 Tecumseth street.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	6 April 2018 – 6 April 2021	5
SM19017	Quality Meats Packers Ltd	2 Tecumseth St	Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development, Combined Application	6 March 2013 – 3 May 2014	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 13 February 2025Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 25 116750 STE 10 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 31 October 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0984/23TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 19 January 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0015/23TEYConditional Consent · Approved
Submitted 19 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 239771 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
Submitted 17 November 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 264041 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
25 116750 STE 10 PL Development application	Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)	13 February 2025	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0984/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	31 October 2023	Closed Approved
B0015/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	19 January 2023	Conditional Consent Approved
21 239771 STE 10 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	19 November 2021	Under Review In progress
17 264041 STE 19 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	17 November 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

2 Tecumseth St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 264041 STE 19 OZ · submitted 17 November 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27305 (TAS Tecumseth Niagara LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27305: Assisting with the development of 2 Tecumseth Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 264041 STE 19 OZ at 2 Tecumseth St: The revised Zoning Amendment By-law application proposes to redevelop the site with four buildings containing a mix of commercial, employment and residential uses, an on-site public park, a multi-use path, other pedestrian and cycling connections and two privately-owned, publicly-accessible open sp… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 2 Tecumseth Street
Matched fields
address
2 TECUMSETH ST
application_address
2 TECUMSETH ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

2 lobbied · 6 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide: 2 lobbied and 6 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide