Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks

1926 Lake Shore Blvd W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 22; 4 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 12; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Location: 43.63586, -79.46739
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

DF Lake Shore LPSM23681 · 4 November 201612
DF Lake Shore Ltd. (as GP of DF Lake Shore LP)SM23717 · 14 November 20168
Diamante Developments Corp.SM23736 · 18 November 20162

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Office of Councillor Doucette, Ward 139
Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park8
Sarah Doucette4
Councillor Doucette1

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Doucette, Ward 13	Councillor staff	9	2	31 October 2017
Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park	Member of council	8	7	30 May 2017
Sarah Doucette	Councillor staff	4	4	30 May 2017
Councillor Doucette	Councillor staff	1	1	21 November 2016

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM23736	Diamante Developments Corp.	1926 Lake Shore Blvd. W.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	18 November 2016 – 18 November 2019	2
SM23717	DF Lake Shore Ltd. (as GP of DF Lake Shore LP)	1926 Lake Shore Blvd West	Planning and Development, Combined Application	14 November 2016 – 31 December 2019	8
SM23681	DF Lake Shore LP	1926 Lake Shore Boulevard West	Planning and Development, Combined Application	4 November 2016 – 1 December 2022	12

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 28 December 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1400/22TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 11 February 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0228/22TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 16 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 199117 STE 04 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 26 July 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 189600 STE 04 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 26 July 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 189609 STE 04 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 8 May 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0611/21TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 8 May 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0612/21TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 5 September 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0971/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 July 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0653/17EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 July 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0067/17EYKApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270607 WET 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 27 February 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 125924 WET 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 12 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A1400/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	28 December 2022	Closed Approved
A0228/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	11 February 2022	Closed Approved
21 199117 STE 04 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	16 August 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
21 189600 STE 04 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	26 July 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
21 189609 STE 04 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	26 July 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0611/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	8 May 2021	Closed Approved
A0612/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	8 May 2021	Closed Approved
A0971/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	5 September 2019	Closed Approved
A0653/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 July 2017	Closed Approved
B0067/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	21 July 2017	Application Withdrawn Withdrawn
16 270607 WET 13 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	23 December 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 125924 WET 13 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	27 February 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 4

8 lobbied · 130 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 4: 8 lobbied and 130 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	130	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4

17 lobbied · 33 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4: 17 lobbied and 33 matched unlobbied applications in 13 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	33	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4

12 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4: 12 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	20	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.