Address · Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
1910 Eglinton Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Location
- 43.72763, -79.29142
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Michael Thompson | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 21 September 2020 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30572 | Yorkreal Holdings Inc. | 1910 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Develop… | 18 September 2020 – 18 September 2021 | 1 |
| SM25415 | Yorkreal Holdings Inc. | 1910 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 8 January 2018 – 31 December 2021 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 29 June 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 161237 ESC 21 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 29 June 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 161239 ESC 21 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 161237 ESC 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 June 2020 | Council Approved Approved |
| 20 161239 ESC 21 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 June 2020 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1910 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 161237 ESC 21 OZ · submitted 29 June 2020 · Council Approved · from registration SM30572 (Yorkreal Holdings Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30572: Development application for 1910 Eglinton Avenue East, Scarborough Ontario M1L 2L9 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 161237 ESC 21 OZ at 1910 Eglinton Ave E: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a 40-storey mixed use building that would include 387 residential units, two levels of underground parking with 187 vehicle parking spaces, 699 square metres of retail space on the ground floor and 2,… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 1910 Eglinton Avenue East, Scarborough Ontario M1L 2L9
Matched fields
- address
- 1910 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1910 EGLINTON AVE E
1910 Eglinton Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 161239 ESC 21 SA · submitted 29 June 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM30572 (Yorkreal Holdings Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30572: Development application for 1910 Eglinton Avenue East, Scarborough Ontario M1L 2L9 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 161239 ESC 21 SA at 1910 Eglinton Ave E: Site Plan Control application permit the redevelopment of the site with a 40-storey mixed use building that would include 387 residential units, two levels of underground parking with 188 vehicle parking spaces, 736.7 square metres of retail space on the ground floor and 2,168.5 square metres of of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 1910 Eglinton Avenue East, Scarborough Ontario M1L 2L9
Matched fields
- address
- 1910 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1910 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21
15 lobbied · 21 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21
10 lobbied · 44 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 44 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.