Address · Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
1731 Lawrence Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Location
- 43.74208, -79.30817
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Michael Thompson | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 1 March 2022 |
| Ward 21 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 1 March 2022 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33211 | Good Shepherd Ministries | 1731 Lawrence Avenue East. | Affordable Housing; Planning and Development Application | 6 May 2022 – 5 May 2023 | 0 |
| SM32872 | Good Shepherd Refuge Social Ministries | 1731 Lawrence Avenue East | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 31 January 2022 – 16 April 2025 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 12 June 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0132/23SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 26 January 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 107528 ESC 21 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0132/23SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 12 June 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 23 107528 ESC 21 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 January 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1731 Lawrence Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
23 107528 ESC 21 SA · submitted 26 January 2023 · Closed · from registration SM33211 (Good Shepherd Ministries)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33211: Representing a non-profit in order to obtain planning permission to build a supportive housing project in the city, also to possibly have fees waived and to secure operations funding for a project at 1731 Lawrence Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 107528 ESC 21 SA at 1731 Lawrence Ave E: Site Plan Approval for a 7-storey mixed-use (office/residential) with a total GFA of 4,372 square metres of above ground area and one level of underground parking totaling 1,351 square metres. This development is seeking submission into the Mayor's Open Door Program for affordable housing on behalf… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ortive housing project in the city, also to possibly have fees waived and to secure operations funding for a project at 1731 Lawrence Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 1731 LAWRENCE AVE E
- application_address
- 1731 LAWRENCE AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 21
3 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21
10 lobbied · 44 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 44 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.