Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
1712 Ellesmere Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Location
- 43.77347, -79.24817
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 23 June 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 165474 ESC 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 June 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 165545 ESC 24 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 June 2023Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 23 165547 ESC 24 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 June 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 165549 ESC 24 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 June 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 165553 ESC 24 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 165474 ESC 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 June 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 23 165545 ESC 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 June 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 165547 ESC 24 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 23 June 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 165549 ESC 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 June 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 165553 ESC 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 June 2023 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1710 Ellesmere Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 165474 ESC 24 OZ · submitted 23 June 2023 · Closed · from registration SM34275 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34275: 1710-1712 Ellesmere Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 165474 ESC 24 OZ at 1710 Ellesmere Rd: Official Plan Amendment & Rezoning for a mixed use development with 5 residential towers. A total of approximately 169,273.88 square metres of gross floor area is proposed, with density of approximately 8.98 FSI. A total of 2,328 residential units are proposed, of which 281 units to be rental units… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1710-1712 Ellesmere Road
Matched fields
- address
- 1710-1712 ELLESMERE RD
- application_address
- 1710 ELLESMERE RD
1710 Ellesmere Rd · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
23 165547 ESC 24 SB · submitted 23 June 2023 · Under Review · from registration SM34275 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34275: 1710-1712 Ellesmere Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 165547 ESC 24 SB at 1710 Ellesmere Rd: Draft Plan of Subdivision application to create 6 blocks to permit a 5 tower mixed-use development on the lands at 1710 Ellesmere Road, including two (2) blocks for public parkland and a new public road block. See Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. 23 165474 ESC 24 … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1710-1712 Ellesmere Road
Matched fields
- address
- 1710-1712 ELLESMERE RD
- application_address
- 1710 ELLESMERE RD
Council and committee items naming this address
- 1710 and 1712 Ellesmere Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Decision Report - Approval2026.SC31.3 · 30 April 2026
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24
8 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 24
6 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.