Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
163 Maplehurst Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.76383, -79.40345
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 21 March 2016 |
| Lily Cheng | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 27 November 2025 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22828 | Kenneth-Sheppard Limited | 163 Maplehurst Avenue | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 24 February 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 1 |
| SM22800 | Kenneth-Sheppard Limited | 163 Maplehurst Avenue | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 18 February 2016 – 18 February 2017 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 27 May 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 163131 NNY 23 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 163131 NNY 23 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 May 2016 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.