Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
1580 Avenue Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.72418, -79.41662
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 4 April 2016 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26544 | Southdown Investco Ltd. | 1580 Avenue Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 24 July 2018 – 24 July 2020 | 0 |
| SM22703 | Stafford Homes Ltd. | 1580 Avenue Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 25 January 2016 – 25 July 2018 | 1 |
| SM22648 | Stafford Homes Ltd. | 1580 Avenue Road. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 12 January 2016 – 31 December 2017 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 20 April 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0154/26NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 21 September 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0624/22NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 8 February 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 113968 NNY 08 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 April 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 140646 NNY 16 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 April 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 140660 NNY 16 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0154/26NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 April 2026 | Closed Approved |
| A0624/22NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 September 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 113968 NNY 08 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 8 February 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 140646 NNY 16 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 April 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 140660 NNY 16 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 April 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1580 Avenue Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 140646 NNY 16 OZ · submitted 14 April 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22648 (Stafford Homes Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22648: Development Applications and related City Policies with respect to the redevelopment of the property located at 1580 Avenue Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 140646 NNY 16 OZ at 1580 Avenue Rd: 7 storey residential building with at grade retail. Beer store would remain on site as tenant. Access to below grade parking and loading from Avenue Road. Residential lobby entrance from Bedford Park. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Applications and related City Policies with respect to the redevelopment of the property located at 1580 Avenue Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 1580 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 1580 AVENUE RD
1580 Avenue Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 140646 NNY 16 OZ · submitted 14 April 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22703 (Stafford Homes Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22703: ZBA application in support of redevelopment of 1580 Avenue Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 140646 NNY 16 OZ at 1580 Avenue Rd: 7 storey residential building with at grade retail. Beer store would remain on site as tenant. Access to below grade parking and loading from Avenue Road. Residential lobby entrance from Bedford Park. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application in support of redevelopment of 1580 Avenue Road
Matched fields
- address
- 1580 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 1580 AVENUE RD
1580 Avenue Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 140660 NNY 16 SA · submitted 14 April 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22648 (Stafford Homes Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22648: Development Applications and related City Policies with respect to the redevelopment of the property located at 1580 Avenue Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 140660 NNY 16 SA at 1580 Avenue Rd: 7 storey residential building with at grade retail. Beer store would remain on site as tenant. Access to below grade parking and loading from Avenue Road. Residential lobby entrance from Bedford Park. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Applications and related City Policies with respect to the redevelopment of the property located at 1580 Avenue Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 1580 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 1580 AVENUE RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 8
7 lobbied · 357 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 8
1 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 26% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.