Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
1555 Queen St E
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.66565, -79.31870
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32532 | RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 1555 Queen Street East | Planning and Development Application | 5 November 2021 – 31 December 2024 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
9- Submitted 7 October 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0901/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 April 2024Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 24 139413 STE 14 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 April 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 137104 STE 14 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 December 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1370/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 September 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1069/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 May 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 152485 STE 14 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 May 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 152801 STE 14 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 May 2020Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 20 145525 STE 14 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 November 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 255597 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 9 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0901/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 7 October 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 24 139413 STE 14 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 23 April 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 24 137104 STE 14 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 16 April 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A1370/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 16 December 2022 | Closed Approved |
| A1069/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 30 September 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 152485 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 May 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 152801 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 May 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 145525 STE 14 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 14 May 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 255597 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 November 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1555 Queen St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 152485 STE 14 SA · submitted 10 May 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32553 (RC Ashbridge Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32553: Municipal Infrastructure, Planning Approvals and Building Permit 1555-1575 Queen Street E (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 152485 STE 14 SA at 1555 Queen St E: Site Plan Approval for a mixed-use building consisting of a 17-storey condominium tower, and a 16-storey rental building atop an 8-storey shared podium. The building will have a non-residential gross floor area of 1,544 square metres and a residential gross floor area of 46,034 square metres. A tot… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Municipal Infrastructure, Planning Approvals and Building Permit 1555-1575 Queen Street E
Matched fields
- address
- 1555-1575 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 1555 QUEEN ST E
1070 Eastern Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 152801 STE 14 SA · submitted 10 May 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32553 (RC Ashbridge Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32553: Municipal Infrastructure, Planning Approvals and Building Permit 1555-1575 Queen Street E (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 152801 STE 14 SA at 1070 Eastern Ave: Site Plan Approval for a 10-storey residential apartment building having a gross floor area of approximately 11,520 square metres and containing 138 affordable residential dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Municipal Infrastructure, Planning Approvals and Building Permit 1555-1575 Queen Street E
Matched fields
- address
- 1555-1575 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 1555 QUEEN ST E
1555 Queen St E · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
20 145525 STE 14 PL · submitted 14 May 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30268 (Context Development Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30268: Don Summerville redevelopment application 1555-1575 Queen street east (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 145525 STE 14 PL at 1555 Queen St E: Part Lot Control Exemption to create 5 components for the Don Summerville project. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Don Summerville redevelopment application 1555-1575 Queen street east
Matched fields
- address
- 1555-1575 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 1555 QUEEN ST E
1555 Queen St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 255597 STE 14 OZ · submitted 29 November 2019 · Closed · from registration SM30268 (Context Development Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30268: Don Summerville redevelopment application 1555-1575 Queen street east (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 255597 STE 14 OZ at 1555 Queen St E: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application to facilitate the development of a 10-storey residential building (TCHC) and a 17-storey mixed-use building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Don Summerville redevelopment application 1555-1575 Queen street east
Matched fields
- address
- 1555-1575 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 1555 QUEEN ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14
4 lobbied · 69 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14
18 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.