Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
150 Sherway Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.60929, -79.56281
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 22 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 20 | 11 | 8 November 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Justin Di Ciano, Ward 5 | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 31 May 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Ana Bailao, Ward 18 | Councillor staff | 5 | 3 | 11 October 2017 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 11 October 2017 |
| Sign By-Law Unit, Toronto Building | City staff | 3 | 3 | 27 April 2017 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 5 October 2017 |
| Office of Councillor John Campbell, Ward 4 | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 11 October 2017 |
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 5 October 2017 |
| Community Planning, Etobicoke York, City Planning | City staff | 1 | 0 | 23 February 2017 |
| Toronto Building | City staff | 1 | 1 | 26 May 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Justin DiCiano, Ward 5 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 29 May 2017 |
| Ward 12 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 May 2017 |
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 38 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge River | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 November 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23942 | Outfront Media LLC | 150 Sherway Drive | By-law / Regulation; Signs | 20 January 2017 – 16 September 2018 | 57 |
| SM23939 | Outfront Media Canada LP | 150 Sherway Drive | Signs | 19 January 2017 – 31 December 2018 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 1 February 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 109622 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 September 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 213779 WET 03 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 April 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 141062 WET 03 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 December 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 264614 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 109622 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 February 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 213779 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 September 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 141062 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 April 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 264614 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | 1,629 | 70% (n=10) | 30% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.