1346 Danforth Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 10; 7 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Location: 43.74383, -79.24696
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Options for HomesSM24479 · 5 May 201710
Options For Homes Non-Profit CorporationSM24053 · 14 March 20170

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Mayor John Tory3
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2
Councillor Cressy1
Councillor Fletcher1
Councillor Layton1
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina1
Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth1

Data table· 7 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	3	1	22 September 2017
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	2	1	18 April 2018
Councillor Cressy	Councillor staff	1	0	16 February 2018
Councillor Fletcher	Councillor staff	1	0	16 February 2018
Councillor Layton	Councillor staff	1	0	16 February 2018
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	1	0	16 February 2018
Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	1	0	16 February 2018

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM24479	Options for Homes	1346 Danforth Rd.	Affordable Housing	5 May 2017 – 29 December 2020	10
SM24053	Options For Homes Non-Profit Corporation	1346 Danforth Rd.	Affordable Housing	14 March 2017 – 31 December 2021	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 26 April 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 149451 ESC 38 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 14 September 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 247037 ESC 38 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
17 149451 ESC 38 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	26 April 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
12 247037 ESC 38 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	14 September 2012	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21

15 lobbied · 21 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21: 15 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	15	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	21	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.