Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
131 Hazelton Avenue
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67477, -79.39451
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 131A HAZELTON AVE.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 3 | 17 February 2012 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM15325 | Sam Mizrahi | 131 Hazelton Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 1 November 2010 – 1 November 2013 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 24 March 2014Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 14 132570 STE 27 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 May 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 196104 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 May 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 196119 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 132570 STE 27 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 24 March 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 196104 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 May 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 196119 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 May 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
131 Hazelton Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 196104 STE 27 OZ · submitted 16 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM15325 (Sam Mizrahi)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15325: 191-195 Davenport Road, 131 Hazelton Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 196104 STE 27 OZ at 131 Hazelton Ave: OPA and Rezoning to permit the lands to be designated for mixed use upon which a redevelopment of the lands consisting of 9 storey mixed use building containing ground floor retail and 38 residential units above is proposed. Included in the proposal are 79 parking spaces located in a below grade pa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 191-195 Davenport Road, 131 Hazelton Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 191-195 DAVENPORT RD
- application_address
- 191 DAVENPORT RD
131 Hazelton Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 196119 STE 27 SA · submitted 16 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM15325 (Sam Mizrahi)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15325: 191-195 Davenport Road, 131 Hazelton Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 196119 STE 27 SA at 131 Hazelton Ave: Site Plan Approval for a 9 storey mixed use building containing 50 square metres of ground floor retail, 499 square metres of office space, and 38 residential units. Included in the proposal are 62 parking spaces located in a below grade parking facility. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 191-195 Davenport Road, 131 Hazelton Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 191-195 DAVENPORT RD
- application_address
- 195 DAVENPORT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.