Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
115 McMahon Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.76700, -79.37108
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 3 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 220950 NNY 17 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 6 December 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4496775Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 19 December 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 277445 NNY 24 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 June 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 195840 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 220950 NNY 17 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| COA-4496775 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 December 2018 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| 17 277445 NNY 24 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 19 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 195840 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 June 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1001-1019 Sheppard Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 195840 NNY 24 SA · submitted 27 June 2013 · Closed · from registration SM22751 (Concord Adex)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22751: Block 12 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East (Concord Park Place) Site Plan Issues (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 195840 NNY 24 SA at 1001-1019 Sheppard Ave E: To permit the construction of 712 residential dwelling units contained with in one 35-storey tower, one 36-storey tower and 16 townhouses with associated 4-level underground parking. NOAC issued on August 11, 2014. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 12 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East (Concord Park Place) Site Plan Issues
Matched fields
- address
- 1001 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 1001-1019 SHEPPARD AVE E
1001-1019 Sheppard Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 195840 NNY 24 SA · submitted 27 June 2013 · Closed · from registration SM22753 (Concord Adex)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22753: Block 15 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East Site Plan Issues (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 195840 NNY 24 SA at 1001-1019 Sheppard Ave E: To permit the construction of 712 residential dwelling units contained with in one 35-storey tower, one 36-storey tower and 16 townhouses with associated 4-level underground parking. NOAC issued on August 11, 2014. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 15 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East Site Plan Issues
Matched fields
- address
- 1001 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 1001-1019 SHEPPARD AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 17
2 lobbied · 54 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 54 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.