106 Northcote Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 1; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 4; 3 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Location: 43.64551, -79.42728
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Pete Gaffney PhotographySM24892 · 26 July 20171

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 18 Davenport1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 18 Davenport	Member of council	1	1	26 July 2017

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM24892	Pete Gaffney Photography	106 Northcote Avenue	Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance	26 July 2017 – 26 July 2018	1

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 14 November 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1169/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 December 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1262/16TEYClosed · Refused
Submitted 21 December 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1263/16TEYClosed · Refused
Submitted 21 December 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0090/16TEYConditional Consent · Refused

Data table· 4 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A1169/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	14 November 2019	Closed Approved
A1262/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 December 2016	Closed Refused
A1263/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 December 2016	Closed Refused
B0090/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	21 December 2016	Conditional Consent Refused

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

106 Northcote Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A1262/16TEY · submitted 21 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24892 (Pete Gaffney Photography)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24892: 106 Northcote Avenue, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1262/16TEY at 106 Northcote Ave: To construct a new three-storey detached dwelling with an integral garage on the newly conveyed lot, as described in consent application B0090/16TEY. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 106 Northcote Avenue, Toronto
Matched fields
address
106 NORTHCOTE AVE
application_address
106 NORTHCOTE AVE
106 Northcote Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A1263/16TEY · submitted 21 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24892 (Pete Gaffney Photography)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24892: 106 Northcote Avenue, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1263/16TEY at 106 Northcote Ave: To maintain the existing two-storey detached dwelling containing two units on the newly conveyed lot as described in consent application B0090/16TEY. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 106 Northcote Avenue, Toronto
Matched fields
address
106 NORTHCOTE AVE
application_address
106 NORTHCOTE AVE
106 Northcote Ave · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0090/16TEY · submitted 21 December 2016 · Conditional Consent · from registration SM24892 (Pete Gaffney Photography)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24892: 106 Northcote Avenue, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0090/16TEY at 106 Northcote Ave: To obtain consent to sever the property into two undersized residential lots. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 106 Northcote Avenue, Toronto
Matched fields
address
106 NORTHCOTE AVE
application_address
106 NORTHCOTE AVE

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

27 lobbied · 333 matched

Median days

Lobbied169
Matched, unlobbied134

Approval rate

Lobbied67% n=27
Matched, unlobbied95% n=279

Refusal rate

Lobbied33%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Appeal rate

Lobbied26%
Matched, unlobbied6%

Objection rate

Lobbied29%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9: 27 lobbied and 333 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	27	169	67% (n=27)	33%	26%	29%
Matched, unlobbied	333	134	95% (n=279)	5%	6%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9

2 lobbied · 7 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 4 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9: 2 lobbied and 7 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide