Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application COA-4163326

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Cancelled; Withdrawn
Submitted: 16 May 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses: 1467 Bathurst St
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 16 May 2017
Status: Cancelled
Outcome recorded: Withdrawn
Hearing date: —
Decision: —
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to sever the southwest corner of exsiting lot (7,588.5 sq m). Part 1 - Parking lot accessory to St. Michael's College School (1515 Bathurst St.).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Canderel Management Inc.
SM31677 · 11 May 2021 · “1467 Bathurst Street”
Kingsett Capital
SM27183 · 17 December 2018 · “1467 Bathurst Street”
Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
SM26183 · 23 May 2018 · “1467 Bathurst Street”
1467 Bathurst Street Holdings Inc.
SM26224 · 15 May 2018 · “1467 Bathurst Street.”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM10391 · 28 February 2008 · “1467 Bathurst St”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.