Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0071/16NY
- Status
- Conditional Consent
- Refused
- Submitted
- 24 October 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 151 Estelle Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 24 October 2016
- Status
- Conditional Consent
- Outcome recorded
- Refused
- Hearing date
- 22 June 2017
- Decision
- Refused
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To obtain consent to sever a portion of land from 149 and 151 Estelle Avenue for the purpose of lot additions to create 3 lots from 2 existing lots. A new detached dwelling is proposed to be constructed on each new lot. The existing dwellings would be demolished. Related minor variance applications have been submitted to accommodate the proposed development.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.