lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0062/16SC

47 Reidmount Ave

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Application Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Submitted
24 November 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses
47 Reidmount Ave
Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted
24 November 2016
Status
Application Withdrawn
Outcome recorded
Withdrawn
Hearing date
—
Decision
—
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to sever the land into two lots for detached dwellings. The proposed lot shown as Part 1 on the attached Lot Division Plan would have a frontage of approximately 23.4 m on Reidmount Avenue and a lot area of approximately 1,001 m2. The proposed lot shown as Part 2 would have a frontage of approximately 38 m on Marilyn Avenue and a lot area of approximately 823 m2.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 2 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.