Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0058/16SC

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 20 October 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses: 3 Haig Ave
Ward: Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted: 20 October 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 19 January 2017
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To sever the land to create a lot for a new detached dwelling. The proposed lot would have a frontage of 7.57 m on Haig Avenue and a lot area of 213 m2, and is shown as Parts 1 and 4 on the attached Lot Division Plan. The existing house would remain on the proposed lot shown as Parts 2 and 3 and would have a frontage of 7.67 m on Haig Avenue and a lot area of 216 m2. PARTS 3 and 4 are proposed pedestrian access easements to allow access to the rear yards.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.