lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0048/15SC

74 Oakridge Dr

Status
Closed
Refused
Submitted
25 September 2015
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses
74 Oakridge Dr
Ward
Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted
25 September 2015
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Refused
Hearing date
18 February 2016
Decision
Refused
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to sever the land at 74 and 78 Oakridge Drive into 5 lots for single family houses, as shown on the attached Lot Division Plan. The property at 74 Oakridge Drive would be severed to create three lots for single family houses, shown as Parts 1, 2 and 3. Additional land from 74 Oakridge Drive, shown as Part 4, would be merged with land to be severed from 78 Oakridge Drive, shown as Part 5, to form another lot for a single family house. A single family house would also be built on the remaining land, shown as Part 6.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 2 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.