Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0038/22SC

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 19 December 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses: 20 Stonehill Crt
Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted: 19 December 2022
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 16 October 2024
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain consent to sever the property into 3 lots and to create easements for the purposes of vehicular and pedestrian driveway and access and privately owned publicly-accessible space. The existing 13-storey apartment building is to remain with the exception of an improved entrance way. The conveyed lots will be developed with a 29-storey apartment building and an 11-storey apartment building. Cross Reference Zoning By-law Amendment File No.: 21 204794 ESC 22 OZ and Site Plan Application File No.: 22 138775 ESC 22 SA, both currently under review.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

DBS Infill Inc.
SM32314 · 7 September 2021 · “20 Stonehill Court”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.