Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0031/19SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 31 July 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 57 Eastville Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 31 July 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 10 February 2022
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To sever the property into two (2) residential lots (PART 1 and PART 2). PART 1 (Retained Lot) is proposed to have a lot frontage of 8.83 metres and a proposed lot area of 378.4 square metres. PART 2 (Conveyed Lot) is proposed to have a lot frontage of 8.83 metres and a lot area of 489.7 square metres. The existing dwelling and ancillary structure is to be demolished with each proposed lot containing a new, 2-storey, detached dwelling requiring variances to the Zoning By-law as outlined in minor variance applications A0149/20SC and A0150/20SC. PART 3 is a 5 metre corner to be dedicated to the City of Toronto.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.