Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0030/24SC
- Status
- Conditional Consent
- Approved
- Submitted
- 16 July 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 3650 Danforth Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 16 July 2024
- Status
- Conditional Consent
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 16 January 2025
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To sever the property into three lots and to establish easements for access and stormwater. Cross Reference Minor Variance Application Nos.: A0160/24SC and A0161/24SC and Site Plan Application No. 22 138766 ESC 20 SA.This application was rescheduled from the December 4, 2024 hearing.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- First GulfSM31645 · 1 January 2021 · “3650 Danforth Ave”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.