Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0029/22NY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 3621 Dufferin St
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 7 December 2022
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To obtain consent to sever the lot for the purpose of a lot addition, and to create easement/right-of-way to allow for vehicular, pedestrian, and servicing access to a future north-south public road to be constructed. Related Planning Files are: 16 271500 NNY 09 SA, 17 280210 NNY 09 OZ and 18 156478 NNY 09 SB.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 3621 Dufferin Storage Limited PartnershipSM32165 · 5 August 2021 · “3621 Dufferin Street”
- Canada Lands CompanySM17397 · 2 November 2011 · “3621 Dufferin Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.