Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0028/20SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 22 July 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 27 Butterworth Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 22 July 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 31 March 2021
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
The purpose of the consent application is to sever the property into two residential lots (Part 1 (Lot to be Retained) and Part 2 (Lot to be Conveyed)) with each lot to be developed with a new detached dwelling. The proposed lot frontages for both Part 1 and Part 2 is 7.62 metres and the lot areas for Parts 1 is 214 square metres and for Part 2 is 232.1 square metres .The development proposal requires variances to the Zoning By-law(s). Cross-Reference minor variance applications (Application A0174/20SC (Part 1) and Application A0173/20SC (Part 2)),
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.