Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0023/17SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 10 May 2017
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 163 August Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 10 May 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 13 July 2017
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
This application is for consent to sever the land into four lots, as shown on the attached Site Plan. Lot to be created Part 1 and Part 5 would have a frontage of 6.86 metres and a lot area of 283 square metres. Lot to be created Part 2 and Part 6 would have a frontage of 6.86 metres and a lot area of 283 square metres. Lot to be created Part 3, 7, 9 and 10 would have a frontage of 6.86 metres and a lot area of 281 square metres. Lot to be created Part 4 and Part 8 would have a frontage of 6.86 metres and a lot area of 283 square metres. The owner is proposing to demolish the existing dwelling and build four new detached houses. In order to facilitate the proposed development, relief from the provision of the Zoning By-law was requested, as outlined in A0155/17SC, A0156/17SC, A0157/17SC and A0158/17SC.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.