Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0022/23NY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 27 June 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 1075 Leslie St
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 27 June 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 2 October 2023
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To obtain consent to the creation of an easement/right of way for pedestrian access to a retaining wall and adjoining landscaping for maintenance and repair purposes. (Related File#: ZBA 15 108593 NNY 25OZ, Draft Plan of Subdivision 15 108578 NNY 25SB, Site Plan 16 193617 NNY 25 SA/19 137676 NNY 16 SA)
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.