lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0020/18NY

37 Wilket Rd

Status
TLAB Appeal
Refused
Submitted
6 April 2018
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses
37 Wilket Rd
Ward
Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted
6 April 2018
Status
TLAB Appeal
Outcome recorded
Refused
Hearing date
27 September 2018
Decision
Refused
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain consent to sever the property into two residential lots. A five unit townhouse development fronting onto Bayview Avenue is proposed on the severed lands to the north and a new detached dwelling fronting onto Wilket Road is proposed for the severed lands to the south. A concurrent zoning by-law amendment application and a site plan application has been filed with City Planning (File No. 18 139773 NNY 25 OZ & File No. 18 139783 NNY 25 SA).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 15

2 lobbied · 26 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 4 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 15: 2 lobbied and 26 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied26Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.